九一星空无限

ZB ZB
Opinion
Live now
Start time
Playing for
End time
Listen live
Up next
ZB

Calls for political parties to make repealing pay equity changes a ‘bottom line’

Author
Julia Gabel,
Publish Date
Tue, 24 Feb 2026, 2:01pm
Pay equity protesters on Budget Day, May 22, 2025. Photo / Marty Melville
Pay equity protesters on Budget Day, May 22, 2025. Photo / Marty Melville

Calls for political parties to make repealing pay equity changes a ‘bottom line’

Author
Julia Gabel,
Publish Date
Tue, 24 Feb 2026, 2:01pm

Political parties are being urged to promise to repeal the controversial pay equity law changes before the general election after the release of a critical report by New Zealand鈥檚 first 鈥減eople鈥檚 select committee鈥.

The just-released report鈥檚 fierce criticism is based on submissions from 10 female former MPS from a range of political parties including National鈥檚 Marilyn Waring and Labour鈥檚 Nanaia Mahuta.

The report lambasts the 鈥渓ack of transparency鈥 in the bill鈥檚 development, which was passed under urgency without the normal scrutiny of a Parliamentary select committee. In her submission to the people鈥檚 select committee, Dame Judy McGregor said this process 鈥渃reated a new low in New Zealand鈥檚 constitutional history with its extraordinary disregard for the time-honoured checks and balances for effective legislation鈥.

The report concluded there was no meaningful engagement with M膩ori whose 鈥渆xisting disadvantage鈥 would be further compounded by the changes, or the Ministry of Women 鈥渄espite the bill proposing a fundamental change to a policy that was squarely within their remit鈥.

In a statement, New Zealand Council of Trade Unions Secretary Melissa Ansell-Bridges said political parties should make the recommendations of the report a 鈥渂ottom line鈥 heading into the general election.

鈥淲omen are demanding cast-iron commitments,鈥 she said.

The changes essentially cancel 33 active pay equity claims while raising the threshold to make a claim and change the way claims are assessed.

Minister Brooke van Velden, who spearheaded the changes, said the former MPs were 鈥渇ree to hold their own opinions and publish their own material鈥 and insisted 鈥渆qual pay is here to stay, and a pay equity system remains.

鈥淭he new law is already being used to process claims. It makes the regime simpler and more robust, focused squarely on sex-based discrimination, and sets out a transparent process through which employers and employees can negotiate questions of equal value.鈥

Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden in her Beehive office at  Parliament. Photo / Mark Mitchell
Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden in her Beehive office at Parliament. Photo / Mark Mitchell

The committee said it was told by submitters 鈥渢here was no evidence鈥 the changes would lead to a more rigorous process which saved money and time or that these changes would make the pay equity process more workable and sustainable.

鈥淭he evidence we received confirmed the effect was anything but this. Nor could we find any information that supported these claims in officials鈥 advice to the Government.鈥

The report said the retrospective application of the law was 鈥減articularly egregious鈥 when applied to human rights and a violation of the 鈥渞ule of law鈥.

Workers, employers, economists, and members of civil society had described to the committee the 鈥渄ismay, loss of trust and sense of waste and betrayal that accompanied their realisation that embedded injustice was going to remain a reality of life for large sections of the most vulnerable in our society鈥.

Dame Judy McGregor. Photo / Natalie Slade
Dame Judy McGregor. Photo / Natalie Slade

Melissa Ansell-Bridges said: 鈥淭his report is clear 鈥 the Government鈥檚 changes to the Equal Pay Act must be repealed and the cancelled claims should be reinstated without a requirement to restart a pay equity process.鈥

The New Zealand Human Rights Commission said the pay equity changes 鈥渦nquestionably undermined human rights鈥 and made it harder to correct pay inequities for 鈥減otentially hundreds of thousands of people working in women-dominated professions鈥.

Professor Gail Pacheco, Equal Employment Opportunities Commissioner for the Human Rights Commission, said the legislative process, which saw the amendments rushed through under urgency, denied those impacted by the changes their right to democratic participation.

鈥淚t must not go unnoticed that as a country we are committed and obligated to not only advance pay equity but also to protect the hard-fought gains we have made.鈥

Kahurangi Carter, the Green Party鈥檚 spokesperson for women, said the Government underestimated how badly this would go down with the public.

Since the changes were announced in May last year, thousands of people have protested and rallied nationwide, including outside of Parliament.

鈥淭his wasn鈥檛 a technical tweak. This was wage theft on a national scale, rushed through without any opportunity for the women affected to have their say,鈥 Carter said.

鈥淧ay inequity disproportionately impacts M膩ori, Pacific and disabled women 鈥 the very communities already facing the greatest barriers to fair pay. This Government is deepening those disparities, not closing them.鈥

Julia Gabel is a Wellington-based political reporter. She joined the Herald in 2020 and has most recently focused on data journalism.

Take your Radio, Podcasts and Music with you