九一星空无限

ZB ZB
Opinion
Live now
Start time
Playing for
End time
Listen live
Up next
ZB

Partner of Auckland mum who died with newborn baby jailed for raping teenager

Author
Anna Leask,
Publish Date
Wed, 27 Aug 2025, 7:09am
Tana-Tui Samuels has been jailed for raping a 15-year-old girl who was sleeping at his West Auckland home after consuming alcohol and cannabis at a birthday party for his teenage daughter.
Tana-Tui Samuels has been jailed for raping a 15-year-old girl who was sleeping at his West Auckland home after consuming alcohol and cannabis at a birthday party for his teenage daughter.

Partner of Auckland mum who died with newborn baby jailed for raping teenager

Author
Anna Leask,
Publish Date
Wed, 27 Aug 2025, 7:09am

Warning: This story is about sexual offending. 

The partner of a woman who died with her baby son days after giving birth has been jailed for more than six years for raping an intoxicated teenager at a birthday party for one of his older children. 

Emerald Tai, 27, and her newborn son died at their West Auckland home in March 2020, hours after leaving Auckland City Hospital against medical advice. 

Both had sepsis, and the coroner said it could not be determined whether the baby died solely from infection or also from suffocation while sleeping under his mother. 

The case prompted investigations by Health New Zealand (formerly Auckland District Health Board) and the Health and Disability Commission (HDC) into Emerald鈥檚 care, including whether sepsis warning signs were missed and discharge protocols followed. 

The Herald can now reveal that in October last year, Emerald鈥檚 partner, Tana-Tui Ngatote Samuels, was jailed for child sex offending. 

The Court of Appeal has recently dismissed his attempt to have his conviction quashed. 

Tana-Tui Samuels (left) and partner Emerald Tai. Tana-Tui Samuels (left) and partner Emerald Tai. 

The victim was 15. She cannot be identified, but court documents state she had known Samuels and Emerald all her life. 

In April 2022, the teenager went to Samuels鈥 home to celebrate his daughter turning 14. 

鈥淭here was alcohol and cannabis being consumed by people at the party. The victim had a considerable amount to drink and also smoked some of the cannabis,鈥 said Judge Terence Singh. 

鈥淪he began to feel sick as a result of consuming alcohol and decided to go upstairs to bed. She said she was feeling tipsy and was 鈥榝alling everywhere鈥.鈥 

The teen was helped upstairs by her best friend. 

Judge Singh said Samuels went to the room sometime later, partly removed the teen鈥檚 clothing, touched her inappropriately and raped her. 

鈥淪he said this lasted approximately 15 minutes. Afterwards, you put your clothes back on and walked out. The victim remained in the room for the night. 

鈥淭he following day, she had a shower and you told her that if she told anyone what happened, you would give her a hiding.鈥 

The teenager told her mother the next day. She reported it to the police in August 2022, and Samuels was charged with sexual violation and rape. 

He denied the offending but was found guilty by a jury after a trial in the Wait膩kere District Court. 

A jury found Samuels guilty of raping a 15-year-old girl. Photo / FileA jury found Samuels guilty of raping a 15-year-old girl. Photo / File 

Judge Singh acknowledged there were 鈥渢wo different accounts鈥 presented at trial, but ultimately the jury accepted the Crown case. 

鈥淚n relation to vulnerability of the victim鈥 she was younger than you, intoxicated, asleep in bed when the offending occurred, and she was not in a position to effectively defend herself. 

鈥淎s she explained in her (police) statement, she couldn鈥檛 do anything because she had been drinking and smoking.鈥 

The judge said the victim was even more vulnerable as she was 鈥渟omewhat immature and unsophisticated鈥 for her age. 

He said Samuels had breached her trust. 

鈥淵ou were 38 years old at the time of the offending and she was in the child to teenager bracket,鈥 he said. 

鈥淪he had spent considerable time at your house鈥 She would have expected to be safe staying the night at your house.鈥 

The victim provided an impact statement for the court. 

鈥淪ince this has happened, I experience flashbacks and often wake up in the middle of the night from nightmares of what was done to me,鈥 she said. 

鈥淚鈥檝e struggled with the long wait for this trial to happen. I don鈥檛 like being touched by anybody or anyone coming too close to me.鈥 

Judge Singh said the teenager struggled to show affection and had 鈥渢urned to drugs and alcohol to get through it鈥. 

鈥淪he says she has distanced herself from people she used to hang out with, and her family has noticed a change in her. She used to have a positive outlook, but this has been mostly negative now,鈥 he said. 

鈥淪he struggled with relationships with her family and used to always attend church and enjoyed going every Sunday with her mum, but this has stopped too. She struggled to be able to be around others and socialise. 

鈥淪he struggles with the damage you have done to her family鈥 She is no longer the person she used to be.鈥 

Samuels denied the offending but was found guilty by a jury - and an appeal against his conviction was dismissed. Samuels denied the offending but was found guilty by a jury - and an appeal against his conviction was dismissed. 

The Crown sought a sentence of 7.5 years in prison. 

Samuels鈥 lawyer suggested seven years, with discounts for his remorse, 鈥渃ultural factors鈥, rehabilitation Samuels had done and 鈥渓oss of work and prospects鈥. 

Judge Singh said he could not give any discount for remorse because Samuels continued to 鈥渉old the view that the offending did not occur鈥. 

He said reports provided to him outlined 鈥渕atters of domestic violence within the family house鈥 when Samuels was young. 

鈥淚 take into account the availability of alcohol and illegal substances to you early on; in fact, you disclosed that you used cannabis at the age of eight,鈥 he said. 

鈥淚 also take into account that there was an unhappy environment when you were growing up, a lack of food and care for you, and a disconnection from your marae. 

鈥淭hen what followed is also traumatic in the sense of you losing your partner, the mother of your six children, as well as your seventh child. That must have been heartbreaking for you.鈥 

Judge Singh said Samuels spoke in 鈥済lowing terms鈥 of his commitment to raising his children, who currently live with another family. 

鈥淭hat is your life and you want the best for them,鈥 he said. 

鈥淚 also take into account you miss them dearly and that you recognise this is a difficult period of your life being without them and them without you. 

鈥淵ou also have a new baby, which you will lose some time with, and the ability to do some of those things you were able to do with your six children. I appreciate that is going to be difficult.鈥 

Judge Singh said there was no 鈥渏oining鈥 between the matters raised in the report and Samuels鈥 offending - however, he accepted there had been challenges, trauma and some systemic deprivation in his life. 

鈥淵ou were a child and should not have had to look for things like where the next meal was going to come from. That should have been provided to you.鈥 

Samuels raped and violated a teenager who was sleeping at his West Auckland home. Samuels raped and violated a teenager who was sleeping at his West Auckland home. 

Judge Singh set a starting point of 7.5 years鈥 imprisonment. 

He gave Samuels a 5% discount to reflect his childhood issues, another 5% for the 鈥渓oss of connection鈥 with his children and 5% for 鈥渞ehabilitation鈥. 

鈥淔or those things such as alcohol and cannabis as well as anger and frustrations, you have taken the time while being in custody to try and uplift yourself and uplift the people around you. 

鈥淚 can see you have been a positive influence on people in prison in trying to help them in any way that you can,鈥 the judge said. 

He also cancelled more than $9600 in fines Samuels had racked up. 

鈥淚t would be preferable when you came out that you did not come out to significant amount of debt because the strong likelihood is you will take back care of your children based on what I know of you,鈥 he said. 

Samuels鈥 final sentence was six years and four months in prison, and he was added to the Child Sex Offender Register. 

He appealed his conviction, saying there had been a miscarriage of justice resulting from the trial judge鈥檚 actions. 

He told the Court of Appeal that Judge Singh 鈥渟hould have declared a mistrial鈥 when a Crown witness gave 鈥減rejudicial evidence 鈥 during cross-examination. 

That evidence was an allegation that Samuels had been seen assaulting Emerald when she was pregnant with her last baby. 

The witness said 鈥渉e was giving her a hiding鈥. 

鈥淚 told him I would have him arrested if he hit (Emerald) again in front of me. 

鈥淚 don鈥檛 wanna see (Emerald) getting hit, beaten, while she鈥檚 pregnant,鈥 the witness said in court. 

Samuels and his late partner Emerald. Samuels and his late partner Emerald. 

Samuels鈥 lawyer stopped the cross-examination at that point and made an application to have a mistrial declared. 

Judge Singh refused, determining that 鈥渨hilst the evidence in question was prejudicial, its potential adverse impact could be addressed through directions鈥. 

Soon after, he gave the jury 鈥渁 strong and clear direction to disregard鈥 the evidence. He repeated that direction before the jury was sent to deliberate. 

Samuels told the Court of Appeal that the steps taken by Judge Singh were 鈥渋nadequate鈥 and that 鈥渢he failure to declare a mistrial has resulted in a miscarriage of justice鈥. 

After considering Samuels鈥 submissions, Justices David Collins, Pheroze Jagose and Thomas Gault dismissed the appeal. 

鈥淲e are satisfied that no miscarriage of justice arose through the way in which Judge Singh gave clear and unequivocal directions to the jury to disregard the prejudicial and inadmissible evidence given by (the witness),鈥 said Justice Collins in the court鈥檚 decision provided to the Herald. 

鈥淭he evidence in question was fleeting and came in during the course of a multi-day trial in which no other evidence was adduced about Mr Samuels鈥 acting violently or about his previous convictions for violence. 

鈥淭he focus of the trial was upon Mr Samuels鈥 sexual offending, not on other violence offending. The jury would have appreciated and understood the Judge鈥檚 clear instructions that the evidence given by [the witness] concerning her having witnessed Mr Samuels hitting [Emerald] was irrelevant.鈥 

Justice Collins addressed Samuels鈥 submission that 鈥渢he jury were incapable of following the directions鈥 given by Judge Singh. 

He said there was no evidence to suggest the jury disregarded or ignored the directions. 

鈥淭he appeal is dismissed,鈥 he ruled. 

SEXUAL HARM 

Where to get help:
If it's an emergency and you feel that you or someone else is at risk, call 111.
If you've ever experienced sexual assault or abuse and need to talk to someone, contact  confidentially, any time 24/7:
鈥 Call 0800 044 334
鈥 Text 4334
鈥 Email [email protected]
鈥 For more info or to web chat visit 
Alternatively contact your local police station - 
If you have been sexually assaulted, remember it's not your fault.

Anna Leask is a senior journalist who covers national crime and justice. She joined the Herald in 2008 and has worked as a journalist for 19 years with a particular focus on family and gender-based violence, child abuse, sexual violence, homicides, mental health and youth crime. She writes, hosts and produces the award-winning podcast A Moment In Crime, released monthly on nzherald.co.nz 

Take your Radio, Podcasts and Music with you