
By Nik Dirga of RNZ
Disposable vape fans will see their habit go up in smoke from Tuesday, as tough new vape rules kick in.
Here鈥檚 what you need to know about changes to vape sales and advertising.
What鈥檚 being banned?
The distribution, manufacture, sale and supply of disposable vapes is being banned from Tuesday.
鈥淲e are getting rid of vapes that are most popular among young people, and that can only be positive,鈥 Associate Health Minister Casey Costello said in announcing the changes last year.
The 2023/24 NZ Health Survey found 10.5% of people aged 15 to 17 vaped daily.
However, pod-style vaping devices will still be sold. They contain pre-filled pods which are swapped out to refill the vape.
Also as of Tuesday, vaping devices, products and packaging can no longer be displayed at general retailers. Specialist vape stores must not display products in any way that makes them visible from outside their place of business 鈥 that includes advertising, display in online stores and in vending machines.
There are also many new restrictions on advertising to promote or encourage the use of vaping products, including to existing customers. The new raft of advertising restrictions mean businesses could face a $2000 infringement fine.
For instance, the Government says it would violate the new regulations if a shop is advertising or posting about vaping products on social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter鈥痮r Google business listings.
鈥淔rom June 17 we will no longer be able to show images of the products,鈥 one online vape retailer says on its website.
There鈥檚 quite a lot of detail in the new advertising rules and a full breakdown can be found on Health New Zealand鈥檚 website.
Also as of Tuesday, vaping specialist retailers can no longer use various promotional techniques such as giving away free vaping products, discounts, offering rewards, cash rebates or gifts for the purchase of vaping products, or offer lotteries or games to people who buy vaping products.
Aren鈥檛 there already some restrictions on vapes?
Yes, as part of the series of changes to the Smokefree Environments and Regulated Products Act 1990 last year. The new changes are the second line of alterations which began coming into effect in December.
As of December, fines for selling to minors and publishing prohibited advertisements were increased, and new vape speciality stores were forbidden from opening within 100m of early childhood education centres. There were already location restrictions saying specialty vape stores had to be at least 300m from schools or marae.
In introducing the amendments to smoking regulations last year, Associate Health Minister Casey Costello said: 鈥淣ew Zealand was too slow to effectively regulate vaping, and youth vaping rates are too high.
鈥淲e have collectively agreed that, we have recognised that, and we know that we can do better. We have to stop young people from taking it up as a habit.鈥
The ban on disposable vapes was put off for six months to allow retailers to prepare for the changes.
Jonathan Devery, chair of the Vaping Industry Association of New Zealand (VIANZ), said the group does support the disposable vapes ban, with a few caveats.
He said while VIANZ 鈥渟upports the intent behind the policy 鈥 to reduce youth access and address the environmental impact of single-use products 鈥 the association is urging caution about the potential unintended consequences鈥.
University of Otago public health professor Janet Hoek, a leading researcher into vaping, said whether or not the ban will make a difference will depend on enforcement and product innovation by the industry.
Will people switch to refillable pods?
鈥淚 would expect [the ban] to reduce youth vaping given young people are very price sensitive,鈥 Hoek said. 鈥淗owever, if the industry responds, as I think it is likely to do, by introducing cheaper pod vapes, the impact will be much less limited than we might hope.鈥
鈥淭hey鈥檙e not a straightforward replacement,鈥 Devery said. 鈥淭here鈥檚 a real risk that removing the most convenient smoking cessation option could drive consumers back to cigarettes.鈥
Hoek said many manufacturers may look for loopholes they can exploit with bans.
鈥淒isposable vapes are typically inexpensive [i.e. may cost less than $10 a device], so the vaping industry may respond by introducing new lower priced reusable vapes,鈥 Hoek said, saying she had seen pod starter kits 鈥 without pods, which cost extra 鈥 being advertised for under $10.
鈥淲e saw this behaviour among tobacco companies as they tried to undermine the impact of increased tobacco excise taxes [they 鈥榮hifted鈥 the tax to higher priced brands, away from lower priced brands and introduced entirely new brands to create a new 鈥榮uper value鈥 partition within the market].鈥
Devery of VIANZ said it鈥檚 possible some vape sales may just go underground.
鈥淭here are also serious concerns about enforcement,鈥 he said. 鈥淓arly warnings from the UK, where a disposable vape ban came into effect on June 1, suggest black market sales are likely to increase.鈥
Hoek said there is a lot of concern that manufacturers may find ways around disposable bans 鈥 she pointed to 鈥淏ig Puff鈥 high-capacity throwaway vapes that have drawn concern in the UK with their own disposables ban.
Several countries have now banned disposable vapes. Photo / 123rf
What does this mean for the vaping industry?
鈥淲e have consistently called for a full ban on disposable vapes, rather than incremental technical fixes, and we welcome the environmental benefits it will bring,鈥 Devery said. 鈥淏ut the transition must be managed carefully to avoid driving consumers back to smoking or into unregulated markets.鈥
The industry group feels that some of the advertising restrictions may ultimately harm consumers and make it harder for retailers to interact with them.
鈥淢any retailers, especially online, have relied on clear product information and guidance to help adults make informed choices,鈥 Devery said. 鈥淣ew restrictions will limit what can be communicated, making it harder for consumers to understand available options or find support to switch.鈥
鈥淩etailers are still recovering from last year鈥檚 rushed regulations that left them with unsellable stock and high compliance costs 鈥 from updating websites to in-store signage,鈥 he said.
Many retailers have discounted their products heavily before the bans take effect.
But should more be done to control vaping?
Hoek said she thought the new measures would help cut youth vaping, but more strategy was needed.
鈥淭here are many omissions from the measures (e.g. the high concentration of vape stores in lower-income communities; the location of vape stores right next to schools). I would favour a more proactive strategy that reduced the appeal, availability, addictiveness and affordability of vaping products.鈥
One of the key complaints about disposable vapes has been the waste they generate, Devery said.
鈥淩emoving disposables will help cut vape-related e-waste by over 80% according to our industry estimates, but more must be done,鈥 he said. 鈥淰IANZ recommends expanded take-back schemes like VapeCycle, producer-responsibility regulations, and better consumer education on safe disposal.鈥
鈥淚 would favour a 鈥榩olluter pays鈥 model, where vape companies are responsible for the costs their products create,鈥 Hoek said.
鈥淰ape companies have been given clear rules to follow, and yet some are already looking for loopholes,鈥 Asthma and Respiratory Foundation chief executive Letitia Harding said in a statement.
Associate Health Minister Casey Costello. Photo / Nick Monro, RNZ
Will this help meet Smokefree 2025 goals?
Back in 2011, New Zealand鈥檚 Government set the goal of a Smokefree New Zealand by 2025. There have been concerns that goal is falling short, with particular worries about M膩ori and Pasifika smoking rates.
Costello has maintained the Government鈥檚 changes will continue work toward the target.
鈥淲e do not want our young people vaping,鈥 Costello said in Parliament. 鈥淲e do not want them taking up this habit. We do not want them to be nicotine addicted. We also don鈥檛 want anybody taking up tobacco and smoking.鈥
The current smokefree goal aims to have less than 5% of the population smoking by December, but the latest data reveals there are still about 300,000 daily smokers 鈥 6.9% of adults 鈥 across the country.
鈥淰IANZ urges the Government to closely monitor the ban鈥檚 impact on smoking rates, particularly among priority groups, and ensure regulations don鈥檛 inadvertently harm those most vulnerable,鈥 Deverey said.
鈥淰aping regulation must be viewed in the context of the devastating harm caused by smoking, which kills two out of every three users.鈥
鈥淪trong rules and environmental responsibility are essential, but the broader goal must remain to reduce smoking and improve public health outcomes.鈥
Hoek said it鈥檚 important vaping retailers were brought along on that goal.
鈥淧eople who sell vaping products should be able to help people switch successfully from smoking to vaping,鈥 she said.
鈥淲e also need to let people know that, once they have switched completely to vaping and no longer think there鈥檚 a risk they would return to smoking, they should stop vaping.
鈥淭hat latter message isn鈥檛 [for obvious reasons] communicated by vaping companies or retailers.鈥
-RNZ
Take your Radio, Podcasts and Music with you
Get the iHeart App
Get more of the radio, music and podcasts you love with the FREE iHeartRadio app. Scan the QR code to download now.
Download from the app stores
Stream unlimited music, thousands of radio stations and podcasts all in one app. iHeartRadio is easy to use and all FREE