九一星空无限

ZB ZB
Opinion
Live now
Start time
Playing for
End time
Listen live
Up next
ZB

Developer fined $48,000 for illegal earthworks at Browns Bay, Northcross

Author
Anne Gibson,
Publish Date
Fri, 14 Nov 2025, 2:41pm
40a Sartors Ave, Northcross, North Shore, Auckland - a site where works were the subject of an Environment Court ruling. Photo / Auckland Council
40a Sartors Ave, Northcross, North Shore, Auckland - a site where works were the subject of an Environment Court ruling. Photo / Auckland Council

Developer fined $48,000 for illegal earthworks at Browns Bay, Northcross

Author
Anne Gibson,
Publish Date
Fri, 14 Nov 2025, 2:41pm

A development business has been fined $48,000 for illegal earthworks on properties in Browns Bay and Northcross on the North Shore in Auckland.

COD Crown Projects pleaded guilty to two charges under the Resource Management Act for unlawful earthworks at two North Shore properties.

Judge Melinda Dickey in the Environment Court heard the case, which related to unauthorised earthworks and sediment discharges from the sites.

Those resulted in significant sediment discharge and breaches of the Auckland Unitary Plan, the court found.

Companies Office records show directors of COD Crown Projects are Julong Guo of Pinehill and Lei Zhang of Castor Bay.

They incorporated the land development and subdivision business in 2014.

Judge Dickey found that the unlawful discharge had 鈥渟ignificant effects on neighbouring properties and the broader environment鈥.

鈥淪ediment deposits were found downstream and contributed to the cumulative death by a thousand cuts that results from uncontrolled discharges.鈥

 85 John Downs Drive, Browns Bay, North Shore, Auckland - the second site where offending occurred. Photo / Auckland Council

85 John Downs Drive, Browns Bay, North Shore, Auckland - the second site where offending occurred. Photo / Auckland Council

The offending was at 40a Sartors Ave, Northcross and 85 John Downs Dr, Browns Bay.

The court rejected COD鈥檚 claim that it was only minimally responsible because contractors had carried out the work.

Judge Dickey ruled that COD, as the landowner and an experienced property developer, had 鈥渢urned a blind eye鈥 to what was happening on its land.

It had failed to take reasonable steps to prevent harm.

鈥淚t would not have taken a great effort to visit and check [the properties]. An experienced company could be expected to know that land cannot be left open, exposed and unchecked for any period of time,鈥 she said.

Auckland Council鈥檚 team leader of investigations Paul Cowling, said the case showed the courts do not take breaches of the Resource Management Act lightly.

鈥淚t鈥檚 a clear signal for property owners, individuals and businesses to make sure they鈥檙e compliant with consent conditions and environmental rules. These rules exist for good reasons, to protect the public from nuisance and harm, and to stop damage to our environment,鈥 he said.

The Auckland Unitary Plan required all earthworks to comply with strict erosion and sediment control standards.

These measures must be installed before work starts, maintained during construction, and kept in place until the site is stabilised.

COD won resource consent in November 2020, subject to conditions including proper erosion and sediment management, stabilisation of bare areas, and prevention of discharges onto public roads or neighbouring land.

Council inspections found ongoing non-compliance between January and August 2023, despite repeated warnings and the issue of an abatement notice in May 2023.

Sediment from the sites flowed onto neighbouring properties and into waterways, with one neighbour鈥檚 garage damaged by runoff.

Anne Gibson has been the Herald鈥榮 property editor for 25 years, written books and covered property extensively here and overseas.

Take your Radio, Podcasts and Music with you