九一星空无限

ZB ZB
Opinion
Live now
Start time
Playing for
End time
Listen live
Up next
ZB

'Multiple excuses': Concrete tradie accused of taking deposits but not completing the jobs

Author
Belinda Feek,
Publish Date
Wed, 30 Jul 2025, 8:49pm
Concrete contractor Jason Mark Lambert is in the Hamilton District Court defending numerous fraud charges. Photo / Belinda Feek
Concrete contractor Jason Mark Lambert is in the Hamilton District Court defending numerous fraud charges. Photo / Belinda Feek

'Multiple excuses': Concrete tradie accused of taking deposits but not completing the jobs

Author
Belinda Feek,
Publish Date
Wed, 30 Jul 2025, 8:49pm

A concrete tradie is accused of taking deposits from 28 customers and not only failing to complete the work, but also not providing any refunds.

Complainants say that while Jason Mark Lambert was initially responsive when questioned about the outstanding work, nothing happened afterwards.

The alleged offending occurred between October 2018 and June 2021. He is now on trial in the Hamilton District Court before Judge Kim Saunders, defending 28 charges involving about $80,000.

Twenty-four of those are causing loss by deception, and the remainder are obtaining by deception and speaking threateningly.

鈥楬e didn鈥檛 complete any work鈥

Police prosecutor Steve Hickey said Lambert offered concreting and landscaping services on Facebook and also answered requests for services wanted.

Contact was made, and quotes were given for complainants from around the Bay of Plenty and Waikato, including Hamilton, Huntly, Te Awamutu, Kihikihi, Ngaruaw膩hia, and Tauranga.

Lambert often sought a 40% deposit before work started, which was paid into a bank account nominated by him. On two occasions, cash was paid.

鈥淓vidence will be given that the defendant, on most occasions, did not complete any work.鈥

Complainants will refer to messages or conversations they had with Lambert, and some would also produce photos.

Other times, a small amount of work was done before Lambert was accused of offering 鈥渕ultiple excuses for not returning to the properties鈥.

As the relationships broke down, refunds were sought, but none were given.

Lambert used four different bank accounts for the complainants to put deposits into, but he was not named as an owner of any of the accounts.

鈥淰iewed separately, it could be argued that each of these failed transactions are a civil breach of contract,鈥 Hickey said.

鈥淭he prosecution case is that due to the number and regularity of the failed transactions, the behaviours displayed by the defendant and the lack of compensation, the defendant never intended to fulfil the work as agreed, therefore deceiving the complainants into paying the deposit sought.鈥

Hickey said once police got involved, it was clear to officers that Lambert 鈥渋ntended to cause a loss to these people鈥.

鈥楾here wasn鈥檛 any bad faith鈥

Co-defence counsel Johnathan Myers said all but one complaint related to 2020 and 2021, when the country was struck by Covid-19, lockdowns, and supply chain issues.

He denied there was any bad faith by his client in entering into contracts.

鈥淢r Lambert entered in good faith and Mr Lambert had every intention to complete the work.

鈥淗owever, while Mr Lambert was not new to concreting work, he was new to running his own business and all the pitfalls that come with that.

Concrete contractor and fraud accused Jason Mark Lambert pictured in the Hamilton District Court this week. Photo / Belinda Feek
Concrete contractor and fraud accused Jason Mark Lambert pictured in the Hamilton District Court this week. Photo / Belinda Feek

Myers said 2020 and 2021 鈥渨ere some of the most challenging years鈥.

The defence counsel said the police had tried to elevate the allegations beyond what they were, 鈥渁 civil dispute about contract work鈥.

He reminded the judge that she would need to be sure that Lambert made false representations or that he was reckless as to whether they were false, and that there was an intention to deceive the victims, and that he was aware that some loss was likely to occur.

鈥業 saw him featured on Fair Go鈥

Gerald Fieten dealt with Lambert in October 2018 when he was suggested as a contractor to do a small concreting job at his rental property at Murphy Lane, Taupiri.

He was given Lambert鈥檚 details by a Versatile garage representative after asking for a recommendation to do a small concreting job.

鈥淲e asked him if he could do it, and he said he could do it. He had a look at the job and texted us a quote.鈥

That quote was $2800, of which he asked for a 60% deposit.

Fieten paid $1500 and was told it would be done a couple of days later.

鈥淒id he?鈥 Hickey asked.

鈥淣o, he didn鈥檛,鈥 Fieten replied.

Lambert asked him to pay the remainder of the money in December, but Fieten refused, because the job still hadn鈥檛 been completed.

鈥淚 didn鈥檛 think it was wise to do that.鈥

By February 2019, Fieten began asking for his deposit back, and Lambert agreed, but nothing was ever paid.

Lambert鈥檚 co-counsel, Kerry Hadaway, put to Fieten that Lambert had visited the property and prepared the area for work.

鈥淗e didn鈥檛 get it ready. I had to get it ready myself,鈥 Fieten said.

鈥淒idn鈥檛 Mr Lambert put the timber edging in?鈥 Hadaway asked.

鈥淣o,鈥 he replied.

鈥淒idn鈥檛 he box the area and get it ready for concreting?鈥 she asked.

鈥淣o,鈥 he said again.

He also rejected her suggestion that Lambert had spent four hours at the property.

鈥淏ut you can鈥檛 be sure of that because you didn鈥檛 live there,鈥 she put to him.

鈥淚 can be sure of that because I put the boxing down myself to get the job done,鈥 he replied.

He eventually made a complaint to the police after seeing Lambert featured on Fair Go in 2021.

鈥楬e never, ever paid鈥 

But it鈥檚 not just clients who were unhappy. The court heard Lambert also failed to pay his bills.

Karl Sinclair, of Kowhai Hire, testified that initially, when Lambert hired goods from him in early 2020, he paid each time.

鈥淗e seemed like a real nice guy, trustworthy guy at the time.鈥

However, by March of that year, the payment of invoices stopped.

鈥淗e just continued to hire quite a bit in a short period of time, probably like two months or whatever.

鈥淭hey were not paid for.

鈥淚t was never disputed that he didn鈥檛 owe the money, but they were never paid.鈥

The total money owed from three unpaid invoices was about $4000, Sinclair said.

He said Lambert was always good at responding to requests for payment, but he 鈥渘ever, ever paid鈥.

鈥淗e told me again and again over different times that he would pay.

Sinclair eventually sent the claim off to the debt collectors, but then finally realised 鈥渋t鈥檚 a waste of our time鈥.

The trial is set down for three weeks.

Belinda Feek is an Open Justice reporter based in Waikato. She has worked at 九一星空无限 for 10 years and has been a journalist for 21.

Take your Radio, Podcasts and Music with you