九一星空无限

ZB ZB
Opinion
Live now
Start time
Playing for
End time
Listen live
Up next
ZB

'This is a disgusting advert:' Complaints after gay sex education ad runs where kids can see it

Author
Jeremy Wilkinson,
Publish Date
Sun, 10 Nov 2024, 4:41pm
The advertisements were designed to promote a healthy conversation about safe sex.
The advertisements were designed to promote a healthy conversation about safe sex.

'This is a disgusting advert:' Complaints after gay sex education ad runs where kids can see it

Author
Jeremy Wilkinson,
Publish Date
Sun, 10 Nov 2024, 4:41pm

A controversial advertisement designed to raise awareness about safe sex for gay men has been taken down after an influx of complaints about children seeing it outside a dairy.

The ad showed two posters that were displayed side-by-side on billboards and online earlier this year. The first one showed a cartoon image of a man鈥檚 naked bottom with the text 鈥淔irst timers, enter here鈥.

The second poster said, 鈥淚ns and Outs 鈥 Sex education for gay and bi guys 鈥 insandouts.org.nz鈥. The 鈥淚鈥 in the word 鈥淚ns鈥 was drawn in the shape of a penis and the 鈥淥鈥 in the word 鈥淥uts鈥 was drawn to look like an anus.

The Burnett Foundation, formerly the New Zealand Aids Foundation, funded the posters to raise awareness about gay and bisexual sex education.

However, they quickly garnered 86 complaints to the Advertising Standards Authority.

鈥楢 disgusting advert鈥

鈥淚 want the posters promoting anal sex outside the Birkdale dairy taken down immediately. This is a disgusting advert to have in a prime location where young children come to a dairy,鈥 one complaint reads.

鈥淭his advert is so incredibly inappropriate to have on display for children to see. It directs them to pornographic material on the Burnett Foundation website.

Other complainants were concerned that the ads seemed more of a 鈥渉ow to鈥 rather than an education on safe sex practices and that they were sexualised for no reason.

Brian Tamaki said Destiny Church made a complaint about the advertisements. Photo / Alex Burton
Brian Tamaki said Destiny Church made a complaint about the advertisements. Photo / Alex Burton

The foundation鈥檚 chief executive, Joe Rich, told 九一星空无限 the ads were designed to target gay, bisexual and men who have sex with other men in New Zealand and fill a gap in sexual education.

People in these groups are 348 times more likely to acquire HIV than others, 108 times more likely to acquire syphilis, and 44 times more likely to acquire gonorrhoea, the foundation claims.

He believed the complaints stemmed from a targeted hate campaign.

鈥淢any complainants were overtly homophobic and demonstrated a personal belief that public health messaging should not address specific communities with some of the very real and important issues related to their health and wellbeing,鈥 he said.

鈥淲e must normalise sex positivity in the public sphere. We know unequivocally from international evidence and programmes, by promoting pleasure as an outcome of practising positive sexual health habits, you achieve greater behaviour change toward better health outcomes.鈥

Christian lobby group Family First posted a photo of the posters on its Facebook in September telling its followers, 鈥淵ou know what to do鈥, accompanied by the Advertising Standards Authority鈥檚 email address.

Its founder, Bob McCoskrie, told 九一星空无限 the adverts were 鈥減erverted鈥 and shouldn鈥檛 be shown in front of families, or children.

鈥淭he Aids Foundation has just been tone-deaf in terms of where and whom they鈥檙e targeting,鈥 he said.

鈥淚 think any big poster promoting anal sex outside a dairy is a no-go and I think most people would agree with that.鈥

McCoskrie said the posters were explicit and he would have also taken issue if they鈥檇 been promoting heterosexual safe sex.

Destiny Church founder Bishop Brian Tamaki also took issue with the ads and posted on X labelling them 鈥減ure filth鈥.

He told 九一星空无限 a complaint had been made to the authority on behalf of his congregation.

鈥淭hat level of sexual content, I just disagree that it should be around the town on windows and storefronts and dairies close by where kids can see it.

鈥淚t鈥檚 not the type of content that children should be exposed to that early in life.鈥

Were they offensive?

The Burnett Foundation said in response that the campaign was not aimed at children and it had carefully selected placements outside of school exclusion zones and ran during the school holiday period.

However, there was a single instance where the ad was mistakenly placed inside one of these exclusion zones. It had been removed by the media company that owned the space.

In a recently released ruling, the authority has ordered the Burnett Foundation to take down the ads and not to use them again.

鈥淎 majority of the Complaints Board said the advertisement was likely to cause serious offence. This is because both posters contained references to sexual activity,鈥 the authority鈥檚 ruling reads.

The majority of the board that reviewed the complaints agreed that it wasn鈥檛 appropriate for 鈥渟uch provocative, sexually explicit text and imagery鈥 to be displayed to the public and that the cartoon-like images and the bright colours could have appealed to children.

A minority of the board disagreed and said the ads didn鈥檛 meet the threshold to cause widespread offence and the posters were conveying an important public health message. That minority also noted that children who saw them would have been unlikely to understand the sexual innuendo.

However, ultimately the board found that the advertisement was not socially responsible and was in breach of the Advertising Code.

An ad campaign from the Burnett Foundation in early 2024 titled "Don't ride distracted" attracted eight complaints, but was not ordered to be removed by the authority. Photo / BFA
An ad campaign from the Burnett Foundation in early 2024 titled "Don't ride distracted" attracted eight complaints, but was not ordered to be removed by the authority. Photo / BFA

Earlier this year another advertising campaign by the foundation urged men to book a discreet HIV test through its website, alongside pictures of topless men.

The ads collected eight complaints that the posters were overtly sexual, but the authority did not order their removal.

Jeremy Wilkinson is an Open Justice reporter based in Manawat奴 covering courts and justice issues with an interest in tribunals. He has been a journalist for nearly a decade and has worked for 九一星空无限 since 2022.

Take your Radio, Podcasts and Music with you